“Reverie” Interview now online
translation services
The Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema rig for the Canon EOS 5D MKII
Canon just posted an interview that I did with them a few weeks ago on their site. In the interview I discuss how the “Reverie” video came to be, my experience with the 5D MKII during the shoot, as well as some upcoming projects and thoughts on where this is all headed. I usually cringe when I see myself quoted in print – but this little interview turned out quite well, I almost sound like I know what I’m talking about! You’ll see a video half way through the article that shows the 5D MKII mounted inside a Redrock Micro rig. You can also view an alternate edit to the behind the scenes video edited by Andre Costantini (who cut Reverie) for Canon’s site.
Hi Vincent,
It’s amazing how fast industry reacts. I know two three cinematographers who are “very interested in DSLR gear” since a short while :-)) And personally I am very keen on seeing your next films, especially the Parcours guys.
Greetings
Peter
Maybe one day……
You are referenced all of the new issue of PhotoPro just released. Makes me feel good.
Best,
Tom
Great interview,,, your links found me here:
http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=2327
Another interesting demo soon to hit the marketplace. Brides will *love* the results.
Hollywood’s big budgets tend to squash real creativity. I’m sooo thrilled these tools are finally reaching those who will turn the world upside down. Cheers, -Steve
Awesome stuff! I can’t wait to see what else you produce in the future this is just the beginning. I also can’t wait to play with one of these myself!!!
http://www.edstonephotography.com
Vince-
In the interview, you mention the specialty nature of the 200mm f/2L and how rarely you used it. I was thinking of ditching my 300 2.8 in favor of the 200 to be able to use that large aperture, figuring that I can always put a 1.4x teleconverter on the 200 (Making a 280 2.8) to get close to my old lens. Other than slightly slower autofocus and modestly decreased image quality, any downsides I’m missing with this plan?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
Charles –
Nope – not really – you’re right on point. The 200mm f2 w/ a 1.4X converter is a powerful combination…. I see myself using the 200mm f2 much more now – and actually not using the 300mm 2.8 much …
Closing the gap, and drifting… I see more and more people going independent and coming up with inventive multimedia products, moving away from the canned solutions that the big studios always end up proposing. My only concern has always been how much can be “lost” and not actually get to be “seen” or “exposed” if more and more go independent not only for production but also for distribution.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 21st, 2008 at 5:47 am
Juan – “flight to quality” – that’s what happens… if you build it – they will come…. people appreciate quality and will find you – if one puts garbage out there – they have no chance…
I’m so inspired by this camera and want to thank you for all you’ve done to promote it with your videos etc. (plug) there’s now a wiki devoted to the 5d ( http://planet5d.com ) and we’ve included lots of info on the mark ii as well as links to your videos(/plug)
Thanks again!
Mitch
in regards to the red rock rig featured in this post, what external monitor do you suggest??? as i am preparing to own a 5d mark II.
I’m hoping that someone can help me with this decision (VINCENT I NEED HELP!!).
I’m going to be purchasing the 5d Mark II and I need a wide angle zoom. I’m looking at the 17-40f/4L and the 16-35 II f/2.8L.
The 17-40L would suit me fine from a photographic standpoint, but I’m wondering if the 16-35 would look better on video with the larger aperture. Video would be casual use.
Juan Reply:
November 22nd, 2008 at 12:11 pm
In the Same Boat Here – which obviously means that I won’t be any help at all, but I am reading and reading the reviews at B&H (select lowest ratings first) to get an idea about what the PRO’s are saying. It’s a bit scary because lots of Pro-Photographers don’t think that Canon’s wide angle lenses are as good as all the others the company produces.
ben Reply:
November 22nd, 2008 at 8:29 pm
At 16 or 17mm, you’re not going to notice the difference between f/4 and f/2.8, because the DOF is so huge. Just about everything in the frame will be in-focus, especially at 1920×1080 (21MP stills are another story).
The 35mm/40mm end is where you’d notice the difference between f/4 and f/2.8, although it’s pretty subtle. 40mm is so close to 50mm that if you want a bigger aperture than f/4, you might as well carry the featherweight 50mm f/1.8. If 35mm is more your style, the 35mm f/2 is light too, and can be had for dirt cheap…
Has anyone found an acceptable viewfinder for this camera? The Red Rock rig seems to overlook this rather important item completely. In the studio an HD monitor from the HDMI connector might be acceptable but in the field with the camera on your shoulder? There’s tremendous potential here, but still a ways to go in using this camera as a full time video/cinema tool.
Great interview, insight in the behind the scenes and general knowledge but Vincent man you killed it with the whole “18 years of experience” repetition thing. I get it, you’re experienced! 😉
Thanks for sharing though.
Seeing the Red Rock rig makes me think more seriously about RED. If you invested in a rig like this, how much of it would need to be upgraded the next time a new body comes out? I like the RED attitude about avoiding obsolesce, and making their modular system work in future sensors and bodies. Personally, I’m sick of having to upgrade bodies every two years, so I find RED interesting in that regard. Their treatment of the early adopters of the Red One speaks volumes about the company (free trade-in at full value toward new Epic system). I think if you’re just going to shoot a little bit of video and mostly stills, the Canon system makes sense. But for true film-makers, I think RED is going to be pretty compelling.
Vincent, i’m a new fan. Do you know by chance approximately how much the dslr bundle from redrock weighs, just the rods and follow focus not the mattebox? Any consideration would be great.
All the best,
Denver Riddle