Famous Footwear – “Neighborhood”
Every one in awhile, life throws you a bone. In this case, Director Loni Peristere of Zoic Studios asked me to shoot 3 commercials with him over a little more than a week in Vancouver. The bone? (Besides the work!) One of those 3 – was to be shot at 600 fps – at night – with snow and with motion control! We all knew that this one had the potential to be very special. And I think Loni and the team nailed this one! Here it is:
[vimeo video_id=”17355509″ width=”700″ height=”525″ title=”Yes” byline=”Yes” portrait=”Yes” autoplay=”No” loop=”No” color=”00adef”]
This was a dream job for me – for several reasons. For one – it was a beautiful story with a simple but strong emotional thread that we can all relate to easily. Second, Loni wanted to make this thing sing visually – and he made sure that I had the resources at hand to pull this shoot off.
First we needed 225,000 Watts of light – a MASSIVE amount – to get enough light to shoot at 600 frames per second – with the Phantom Gold HD camera. I brought one of my favorite people up with me to Canada – Gaffer Mark Lindsay who wielded the light with ease. Basically we had enough light to cook an egg in under 10 seconds – and a turkey in under an hour. BUT – believe it or not – all of this light got us a whopping aperture of f 2.0 on the Cooke S4/i primes… So Yeah… think about that for a second: 225,000 Watts of light and you get f 2.0…!!! Even with a 360º shutter (359º to be exact) – at 600 fps SO LITTLE LIGHT is actually making it to the sensor.
This was a huge technical challenge – and one that several people told us: “could not be done” on as large a stage/setting as we were hopping to do – with diffused lights. Lighting it with enough light is easy – but lighting it well is not with a good quality and shape of light isn’t.
Below is a great video that shows you the behind the scenes shoot – all of the people, the gear, the lights. A HUGE thanks goes out to Chris Dowsett for shooting this footage – and for putting this edit together for everyone to see!
[vimeo video_id=”17387884″ width=”700″ height=”525″ title=”Yes” byline=”Yes” portrait=”Yes” autoplay=”No” loop=”No” color=”00adef”]
You’ll see we used the GoPro HD camera (see bottom of that page) and mounted it on the motion control rig to get you a first person perspective – or a first camera perspective if you will.
One other hero on the shoot – was my 1st AC – or focus puller. Cam Hayduk – with more than 26 years of experience under his belt as a 1st AC, had the impossible challenge of keeping focus with up to a 100mm (see the tight headshot of our actress with hair flowing) WHILE moving on a dolly, as she too was running towards camera. Did I mention this was done at f 2.0> At one point we had less than an inch of depth of field. And don’t forget – that a split second of being out of focus at 600 fps- or “buzzing” – last an even greater eternity when played back at 24 fps. (One quarter second shot at 600fps will last 6.25 SECONDS when played back at 24fps…. that’s a long time for everyone to see you were soft on set… no pressure at all there!) And not to belabor the point: but the dolly was being pulled/pushed by skilled human beings – not a robot. Ergo a variance in speed in both the dolly, and the actress was expected – not to mention a ramp up an down. Each burst lasted 7 seconds max with the RAM aboard the camera at 2048X1080… Cam was the MVP of this shoot in my book.
The last technical challenge? When shooting at f 2.0 – how could we get multiple planes of focus at once? It was impossible. We discussed tilt-shift lenses – but those would have looked quite odd with snow. Adding twice the amount of light (cost prohibitive!) would have gotten us all of f 2.8.
Therefore we shot many of the sequences with a motion control rig. Basically a computerized dolly/jib system – that can repeat each move EXACTLY time and time again. You’ll notice one shot where the actor puts his foot down from the cab – and the actress is running towards him. Getting them both in focus at 600 fps wide open would have been impossible. Here is the magic of Motion Control + a great post house to splice them together seamlessly.
Overall – all 3 shoots were a blast. But this one is special for me. Not only did it turn out beautifully – but we had an absolute blast on set – as you can witness by all of the smiles in the behind the scenes video. (And we were shooting NIGHTS!!! After 3 shoot days during daylight hours.)
Thanks to the entire crew, cast, production, art deparment, PAs and to the incredible people who did the post at Zoic – and to Loni – it was an unforgettable two winter nights in Vancouver – in July!
and if you haven’t seen enough, here’s one more: a time lapse Chris shot of everything being set up:
[vimeo video_id=”14785537″ width=”700″ height=”525″ title=”Yes” byline=”Yes” portrait=”Yes” autoplay=”No” loop=”No” color=”00adef”]
An ignorant question but how did you get the GoPro footage to match up so well with the other, “top of line” cams? Great work all around.
Andreas Sikkema Reply:
December 2nd, 2010 at 8:34 am
@Ray Ortega,
Yeah, I’d love if someone told “us” amateurs how to get a look like that from a GoPro HD Hero using amateur tools. My videos always look very washed out.
—
Andreas
Dirk Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:34 am
@Andreas Sikkema,
there’s no GoPro footage in the final spot. it would never compare. the GoPro footage only appears in the bts video.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:44 pm
@Dirk, Correct. It DOES cut together with 5D MKII footage pretty impressively though depending on the situation. For the size and cost of that camera – the results are pretty stunning!
Chris Dowsett Reply:
December 4th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
@Vincent Laforet, @dirk most of the matching process is done in “color”. Out of camera they look pretty different but after some color grading and contrast adjustments they really start to compliment each other.
Man…. And I was thinking I could make something like this with my D60…
Brilliant! What an elite technical team you had to work with! I was wondering how long did the whole shoot span? Also why was 360 shutter used instead of 180? Thanks!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:45 pm
@Khayyam khan, Twice as much light – we needed it. At 600fps it somewhat irrelevant in terms of motion blur.
This is BEAUTIFUL! I was always drawn to motion picture because it so amazes me and is so beautiful…moving images. You do it well!! I could never handle the extreme amount of work that it takes and people that it takes to create a project, which is why I stuck with photography 🙂 So gorgeous though and really exciting to see all that does into your work!!!
Vincent, you are beginning to leave a legacy of sorts in the video realm. Thank you for sharing as always.
Absolutely incredible!! Deffinately the best advert of the year!!
Kirk
Damn! I thought you shot this with a Flip cam.
brilliant stuff, thank you for sharing, and for sharing the song as well.
Maybe i should show this to my clients next time they ask if i can “swing by” with my d7000 and shoot a quick commercial…:-)
Maria Reply:
December 5th, 2010 at 7:21 pm
@jeremy, whats the name of the song?
Brillant!!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:46 pm
@Tarek, Thanks everyone for the very encouraging words! The best past of this experience: the result was great – but so was the experience on set. And when you marry the two – it’s pretty much the best part of filmmaking /shooting commercials !
Lovely Work. Love ethereal quality the 600 fps created. As a creative choice it spoke brilliantly to the heart of the spot.
Curious … What sources did you using in the coops? Also wondering what about the balance… How much of your exposure came from the overhead vs the low sources?
Again simply mesmerizing work and great case study.
Great work. It’s amazing what went into making this 56 second commercial.
Great work!
I sort of envy you for getting to play with the good stuff… Makes me wonder what you’d be able to do with the Canons in a daylight scene at 60fps, a Kessler ShuttlePod with motion control…
Quick question that is not even really related to this post but when you started talking frame rates it brought up a question. Broadcast TV in the USA is 29.97 or even 59.94. When you are not shooting film but rather digital with a 5D or RED or whatever, do you shoot everything 24P to keep that cinema look and keep it 24P through the edit, etc. and then at the very last stage output to broadcast frame rates? I guess this would apply to film too—even though the final destination is broadcast, do you shoot at 24FPS and carry that all the way through until your final online session?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:50 pm
@dana, The short answer is yes. To go from 24 – 30 fps is easy and done every day. To go from 30 to 24 fps is and always has been significantly more difficult because you have to drop frames… most cinema people don’t want to shoot 30 fps because many high end projectors at theaters can ONLY project 24 fps material – that’s a big important detail most people miss as to the whole 30 vs 24 fps debate. And yes – there is a strange quality w/ 24 vs 30 fps in the end.
Vincent, you are one of the coolest cat out there!!! Your work is inspiring…
Thank you for sharing all you knowledge, that what sets you apart from the rest of us!!! But please tell us when the Mark III is coming out… I can’t take the torture any longer…. 🙂
All the best and Happy Holidays!!!
watching this was a definite treat! thank you, vincent 🙂
I honestly never thought I’d see a Famous Footwear commercial that I would describe as “beautiful”. But you guys sure made that possible.
Great stuff as always Vincent.
Very cool shoot amigo. I too am pinching myself having this dream job where people actually give us DINERO to do stuff like this.
Cheers!
YOU ROCK! This is truly amazing work. Way to go buddy!
Absolutely beautiful! Inspiring! …and the final product has so much emotion and validity for our current holiday season. Good work Vincent and Team! and good work Famous Footwear for pulling out all the stops and budget to make something extraordinary!
i love this blog and vincent’s willingness to share with the community, but could i be so bold as to be the first to offer some critique, rather than praise?
i noticed these things on the first play, so it’s not like i was pixel-peeping to find something wrong with what is undeniably a great little spot.
the shot that begins at 0:31 (foot descending from the taxi) has something wrong with it. I’m not entirely sure what it is yet, perhaps others could help pinpoint it? The shot is one of the motion-control shots to be able to get the boot near focus with the girl in focus at f2.0. But to my eye, the girl looks clearly cut-out. I’m not sure if it’s the rotoscoping of her hair, or the depth-of-field on the falling snow, or what, but there’s something giving this one away. it’s clear that she’s been inserted in the frame. any other theories?
also, i’m pretty sure the final shot of the couple falling down has been messed with in post. It was shot in focus and has had a lens blur effect applied. unsuccessfully, i would say. most viewers wouldn’t be able to describe it, but there is again something uncanny and wrong about the shot. because the characters had to be masked to achieve the lens blur, their interactions with the highlights behind them gives them that cut-out feeling.
anyone else have the same feeling?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:40 pm
@Dirk, I’ll have to check the roto work on the 0:31 shot – I haven’t noticed an issue with it. But it IS indeed done in post – no way to get both of them in focus at f2.0. My guess is that you’re reacting to that fact – perhaps I’m wrong.
As to your second point – I’m afraid to say you’re wrong. It was all out of focus on purpose. The idea being that it was THEIR moment…
Dirk Reply:
December 4th, 2010 at 12:50 pm
@Vincent Laforet, Thanks for your gracious reply, vincent! As I said in my initial comment, this is undeniably a great commercial! I just thought that the final shot must have been originally in focus because the highlight bokeh got smaller as they fell away, leading me to believe that the focus was following them. Again, thanks for giving us all insight into these productions!
Having been a part of this shoot (agency art director), I have to say what a pleasure and privilege it was to work with such an amazing talent as Vincent. Very cool guy who knows his s*** and likes his scotch. I hope our paths cross again soon.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:41 pm
@Andy Anema, Andy! So great to hear from you and thanks so much for the compliment! It’s bourbon my friend – I can’t drink Scotch 😉 Hope to see you / work with you again – the entire process was an absolute pleasure for me – and for everyone involved I think!
Lots of fun working with you on this Vincent. Thanks to you for being a total pro and thanks to all those involved (Loni, Zoic, Nylon, Campbell Mithun, and Famous Footwear) The spots turned out great. (the agency producer)
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:43 pm
@Alex Colvin, Alex! Great to hear from you too! I’ll remember the time we spent on the balcony of the Opus hotel well … it was a LOT of fun! Did that trunk every make it back in one piece?!?!?
Sensational! This is the sort of work that we can all point to and say, “See what can be done!” God bless the clients or the agency or whomever had the vision to look past cost and envision quality. I’m only a VO guy and audio producer, but after catching this one on TV (via Hulu) last night, I had to go online to get more of the back story.
Job well done!
Very nice indeed! I personally don’t see the girl as being clearly cut-out, in fact, I had no clue that was two separate shots. One thing that does catch my attention is the ladder shot, if it were me, and it isn’t, I would leave that shot on the cutting room floor. To me, it comes out of nowhere and the DOF so shallow I didn’t see the actress running in the background the first time I looked at this. Anyway, just my own opinion. Very nicely done!!
Slighly off topic…Who was the actress in that commercial? She looks so familiar…
stunning, It’s always a pleasure to see your works and inspired me(a still photographer) greatly , well done and thanks for sharing Vincent.
WOW Vince and the whole team! Man what is this a beautiful ad! I wanted to watch it several times so amazing inspiring this is for me. Thanks for sharing the how-to. I think this is a the example of latest technology combined with good story telling. I like the techniques but more over it complements the story so well. The result: an emotional feel good story for the holidays. well done! and thanks for your time to share it.
P
oh by the way… where are the other ads? are they finished and public yet?
From 0:45 to 0:51 the aspect of the spot is a little strange, but the global result is impressive.
Good work!
Hi Vincent,
Great commercial. I was checking out the Planet 5D blog and they posted a video showing slow motion footage of BMX riders. It was shot with the Canon 7D and a program called Twixtor: http://www.revisionfx.com/products/twixtor/ which actually speeds up or slows down the frame rate.
Could you have gotten the same results using that program, and without using so much light?
Here’s the BMX footage:http://blog.planet5d.com/2010/12/canon-eos-7d-footage-at-2000-frames-per-second/
Vincent, this was a truly wonderful spot and THANK YOU so much for your willingness to keep sharing your art and, more importantly, the BTS portions of your processes. I wish you had the time to share more and more and more and more…
Hey Vincent!!!!! Again you… This commercial is very powerful… the message is pretty clear and the technique is wowww thanks for sharing and Congrats man! Regards from Mexico!
Simple idea beautifully executed. Congrats to yourself and the team, and thanks for sharing.
Great video vincent, I don’t like how FF cut it up in their final commercial to fit it into 30 seconds, kinda kills the story, but this video absolutely blows me away. I guess that’s how it works sometimes, you get paid and they do whatever to it.
I just saw this commercial for the first time on TV over the weekend. All I can say is, WOW! Great job, Vincent.
Bravo Vincent. Spectacular job. And that Phantom too… what a smart invention…
I DVR everything just to fast forward through commercials but when this commercial came on I was mesmerized. It was absolutely stunning and I replayed it several times just to take it all in and try to figure out how it was done. Congrats to you and the entire team who worked on this…AMAZING job!
(P.S. I also now want those boots she is wearing!)
Amazing work Vincent. Truly inspiring.
What type of lighting fixtures were used?
What’s the name of the song used in the “neighborhood” commercial?
Very good job by the way:)
Hi Vincent, there is a password to see the making of video. Can you tell what it is, I am really curious about this shooting. Thanx
I’m no techie, but I did some time at a video training school in LA, and I have to say I was blown away by this shoot. It’s almost too much to take in during one viewing, so I searched online and here you all are! The actress was very believeable and attractive, to boot. No pun intended. She looks like a younger version of the actress Ali Larter, who played the accused husband killer in “Legally Blonde.” Absolutely spectacular job done by all. The quality of American TV ads thankfully is changing. Bravo!
@Dirk, I see what you mean about the very end of the commercial (the focus thing), and I have some thoughts.
1. In the BTS video, at 2:13, right after the couple fall out of the screen, the camera enters from the left and we see (I think) the focus puller rotating the focus wheel/arm forward. This would account for the background bokeh shifting/changing after the couple falls below the edge of the screen in the final spot.
2. Vincent said that focus was critical for most of these shots, and he specifically stated that the couple was out of focus on purpose. With these two thoughts in mind, watch the last few seconds of the final spot again – notice how her hair comes into focus just as they are leaving the frame?
If someone applied a digital focus effect to the couple, the effect would have been applied to the whole shot, so her hair would never come into focus the way it does.
I think with the tight focal plane, the couple is actually out of focus for the shot. But as their bodies fall away from the camera, they get further from the camera and they just creep into the focal plane before leaving the screen.
Then the background bokeh shifts (from the focus puller rotating the arm.)
Does this make sense?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
February 3rd, 2011 at 9:19 am
It does – good eye
A formidable share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing slightly evaluation on this. And he the truth is purchased me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If attainable, as you change into experience, would you thoughts updating your weblog with extra details? It is highly helpful for me. Large thumb up for this blog post!
Very very good ~~ thinks ~~~~
What’s the name of the actress that is featured in this commerial?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 8th, 2011 at 2:56 am
Geez I don’t remember sorry
Is the actor Scott Clifton? Please satisfy my curiosity… I have searched EVERYWHERE for the answer! 🙂 LOVELY JOB, by the way!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 22nd, 2011 at 5:49 pm
Let me track down the call sheets in 2012
The actress is Stephanie Johannesen
I also am wondering if the male actor is Scott Clifton? My Mother and I have been debating this; I think it’s him. Beautiful commercial! Thanks, Joanne
Woah this weblog is wonderful i love studying your articles. Stay up the great work! You already know, lots of people are looking round for this info, you could aid them greatly.
Great tremendous things here. I am very satisfied to look your post. Thank you so much and i am looking forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a mail?
Vincent, how did you avoid flicker at that speed? I know tungsten can flicker as well as HMI at speeds above 120. Thanks