VISUALS App is Live – Looking to the Future
I am extremely excited to announce the launch of my iApp today (which runs on the iPad, iPhone, and iTouch). Its been a labor of love that has taken well over 6 months to bring to fruition. I sure hope you get the chance to check it out here. (You can download the app from your devices directly or of course from iTunes). The initial application is free because I wanted to give everyone a chance to experience it and some of the new features (you will then be given the option to purchase additional individual image collections or al of them at a discount). The app contains some of my favorite images from my day as a staff photographer at the New York Times, and each image is accompanied by a video of me sharing the story behind the images, as well as many technical challenges that I faced and how I overcame them.
There is something that I would like to emphasize in particular: the impetus behind this app was not to have it serve as a self promotional tool, but instead to establish a direct connection with the photography audience and fans of my photography. I believe that as we look forward, photographers are going to be sustaining their careers and body of work by connecting directly with their audiences and fans of their work – as opposed to the more traditional delivery platforms such as publications. In other words, I am not sure that the old world way of distributing your images through large publications will be as effective as trying to develop a relationship with your audience directly. My goal is for his app to be a step in that direction, and perhaps even to lay the groundwork for others to do the same.
[vimeo video_id=”17934166″ width=”700″ height=”525″ title=”Yes” byline=”Yes” portrait=”Yes” autoplay=”No” loop=”No” color=”00adef”]
I would like to share one example with you that I think speaks to the changes that are happening in the traditional publication model of our industry. Prior to the economic/publishing-world meltdown two years ago, it was not uncommon for me to fly five times a month for editorial publications alone. Since then, I have only flown five times in the past two years for editorial publications. It has become clear to me that the only way to sustain the high level of expense for producing aerial photography (a helicopter is $2000/hr on average!) would be to get support from fans of the photography directly. While fine art prints of these images have sold consistently over the years, I think the idea of getting fans of the work to make contribution of a few dollars in greater numbers is the way of the future for all artists.
This distribution/commercial model will give all artists a greater and more creative future in connecting directly with their audience and selling greater numbers at smaller price – as opposed to going through an intermediary (studio, label, publisher, etc…) – a process which generally contributes to widening the rift between an artist and their audience. My hope is that this new trend will open artists up to doing even more creative work that is focused on pushing the envelope, rather than meeting the commercial needs of the aforementioned entities.
Below you will find a video that illustrates the features of the app. I hope that you take the time to check it out. I thank you for your support in purchasing some of the collections or all of them – as it will go toward future photography projects and perhaps a video application down the line.
There is also one more feature that I wanted to point out – this app allows you to share the photographs via email with others and save them to your device – which i hope promotes the idea of sharing work and opening up discussion. I think that one of the main flaws of most publication applications to date is that they fail to embrace the idea of sharing their content and enabling their users to do so as well.
Thank you to Equity Incubator for helping make this wonderful app and for all the time they put into it. Should you be interested in developing a similar app or a different photography app of your own, feel free to contact them HERE.
Very exciting Vincent. I completely agree about the need for artists, photographers and musicians to start developing their own communities that support them. I’m downloading your app now and appreciate the information on the gear page.
Earlier this year I was using a Sony CX550 connected to a Letus Mini and a series of FD lenses.. just moved to the NEX-5 (and shortly VG10 + 2 gopros) in the pelican case for my productions.. still using the FD lenses on the NEX-5 with an ebay adapter 🙂 Audio is Zoom h4n / h1, miller carbon solo tripod / manfrotto combi-boom etc.. Lights are the Comer 1800b + Rotolight interview kit and some work lights if I want to plug in..
I am struggling to decide between Edius 6 or moving from PCs to FCP (+ relevant laptop).. Edius seems to eat and breathe AVCHD (http://www.grassvalley.com/products/edius_6) compared to FCP.. no pro-res conversion.. Any thoughts on Edius vs FCP?
Thank you for all the info – jib/slider/dolly is next 😀
The app has some working flaws (orientation bugs, image viewing bugs). This will probably be fixed with some updates, so it’s not a big deal.
What concerns me is that you say you took some images in 2003 and 2004, for the NYTimes with Canon 1d mark III and IV – cameras that were launched in 2007 and 2009. I understand that helicopters aren’t cheap, as you keep mentioning, but it’s not worth it to lie in order to get some $ from Amazon (who the app links to and only sells newer cameras, like the mark III and IV, not the older models that were actually used). Not nice!
In your New York City Blackout image, the exposure information says “focal length”: “16-35mm”. In your video explaining the image, you said you used a 24-70mm. It seems as if there is an inconsistency between your exif info and your video explanation.
-Ray
There appears to be a bug with the way the focal length for each image is displayed. Instead of displaying the actual focal length under “FOCAL LENGTH”, it’s showing the focal range of the lens that was used – ie, it’ll show “70-200mm” instead of the actual focal length used for that particular photo.
@Andrei, It’s actually done to protect people who don’t know cameras well. I don’t see any logic in listing 5-10 year old model cameras that are a. not available anymore or b. don’t perform as well as today’s camera.
This was a pretty quick decision for me. If I had done it the other way around – BELIEVE me I would have had people complaining that I suggested they buy a 1D when a 1D MKIV is currently available… or worse – buy an A2E (film camera) when the 5D MKII exists.
Andrei – ask yourself seriously: what is the point of listing a 10 year old model when a. it can no longer be bought and b. it’s antiquated.
Fair enough?
@Ray Whitehouse, Actually – this only applies to some of the NYTimes images. One of the remnants of shooting in JPG mode and using transmits as reference photos. Unlike CR2s the entire EXIF data is not always available so I have to make my best guest. For example – the Blackout was made with a 28mm and could have been made with either lens. I have to admit that for a few of the NYT images I had to make my best guess on which if the two overlapping lenses I used – but I am sure of the focal length.
@Martin, It’s not a bug – it goes to the exact same comment about the NYTimes images being shot in JPEG and not having full metadata.
I should point out that ALL images in the other collections were shot after I left the NYT and were shot in RAW mode (CR2s) and have exact metadata info without exception.
Vincent, congrats! This app is amazing. Really appreciate the great insight into each picture, very inspiring. Bought the whole collection for the iPad, and feel like it’s an amazing deal.
Way to ‘own’ new media, and create an app that really expresses the medium of photography at a new level.
Vincent,
As always you are leading the way!
Being that I’m an Android and PC user, i can’t downlaod the app unfortunentally.
Congrates and kudos for pushing the envelope
Hey Vincent! This is brilliant. I hope other photographers follow you in this distribution scheme. I would love to have photo books from all of my favorite photogs on my iPad. One question though: If I buy all of the collections on iPad does this mean I will have to repurchase them for my iPhone?
Looks very nice!
But I’m still using my iPod Touch 1G which can’t update to 3.2…
Is there a possibility to make further updates available for versions below 3.2? That would be really cool!
Thanks A.
Congratulations, as I think you’re on to something here but I’d challenge you to think bigger. This app could become a very good virtual gallery not just for yourself, but for other photographers as well. Changing the galleries to be free to view (or a free version of the viewer with some iAds) could make this a great venue for people who love photography to see some great work and still fund the artists (as well as yourself). Give them the opportunity to buy a download of the image, a wallpaper, or a print, and I think you’d ultimately get a significantly larger volume of traffic, make money while giving a good value, but also provide a platform to rekindle the appreciation of fine photography. Unfortunately right now I’ve downloaded the app, scrolled through it and feel that I’m pretty much done. I’d love to see this become more of an experience that the viewer can come back to over and over and get more and more out of it. Please don’t take this as a comment from one of the “haters”, but as a call to think bigger and make this a true game changer.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 22nd, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Who’s saying we haven’t already thought about this…. 😉
Vincent!! Congrats on the app! I have been working on a Iphone app myself. We are still working out the details but its a great platform to share photos. It’s going to be geared towards “Extreme Sports” photography. Thanks for leading the way!!!
Bravo, Vincent. Just downloaded the app. It looks very sharp and runs very smoothly on my first viewing. Gotta give you props on helping forge a way through our ever changing photo landscape.
Great app. I always enjoy reading/looking at your blog. I like to see what you have done, are doing and about to do. I am always motivated when I finish one of your posts. Thank you very much for being open to sharing.
Edwin
Official Tissue Vincent! It’s like I tell my students, “you are either moving forward or your staying still.” No criticism here, just kudos to you for always looking at how we can push art and creativity out there for all to see.
@Vincent Laforet, I dunno… I found it annoying too to have you say one thing in the video and the overlay say another. Maybe have 2 entries in the overlay: 1) The camera you actually used. 2) Contemporary equivalent (with Amazon link).
Actually, even if I one follows your logic, why mention the 1D Mark III on a few pictures when it has been replaced with the Mark IV?
A few extra tidbits of constructive criticism:
1) Ditch the splash screen (or make it way shorter)
2) I really enjoy the videos, but I wish I could still see the picture while you’re talking about it. Ideally, your videos should cut back and forth between you and whatever bits of the picture you’re talking about.
3) On iPhone 4, sometimes when I exit out of the video player, the photo orientation is wrong and the only way to reset it is to restart the app.
4) Would be nice to know how many images are in each collection prior to purchasing them.
5) Wish I could zoom in on the pictures on iPhone.
Anyways… minor stuff. Great app. Shows amazing “outside the box” thinking on your part.
–Xavier
Great app. I always enjoy reading/looking at your blog. I like to see what you have done, are doing and about to do. I am always motivated when I finish one of your posts. Thank you very much for being open to sharing.
Vincent,
In reference to the equipment discrepancies. It’s all about integrity, truth and conscience. Respect your audience. Your level of expertise is not for the casual point and shoot photographer, but those who want to excel in the craft. I realize that you have to work with your partners in this project, but stand up to truth. It is an investment in your future as a leader in the field who demonstrates integrity when teaching others. Tell us what you used at the time of the shoot to the best of your ability. If you’re not sure, tell us. We can deal with it. Link to modern equipment if you must. Trust us to interpret your information to make informed choices for ourselves. If I study an image by HCB, or Ansel Adams, or Galen Rowell, I don’t want someone telling me that they used some more modern piece of equipment. Thank you for your consideration.
John
Looking forward to seeing the future of this app and to see what avenues it creates for many others. Mr. Jarvis needs to step on it 🙂
Just kidding. Glad to see another photographer using today’s technology to promote himself. Well done.
@John, I will update the app description to state that the camera models listed are “today’s equivalent” to what I shot the images with – which they are. Otherwise you won’t BELIEVE the hell I’ll get from people if I tell them to buy an original 1D whehn the 1D MKIV is out – BELIEVE me… that’s far worse. And if you truly want to know the truth – getting all of the icons etc – was close to impossible for the old cameras – so we decided to put the most up to date camera possible that represented what people would use today to make similar images. I hope you understand.
Some quick responses to comments re VISUALS app ( http://tinyurl.com/23z4qms ) Below:
1. Chose to include current camera models relative to the old ones that were no longer being produced /sold. Listing a Canon A2E from 2000 didn’t seem to make sense…when 5D MKII is best, current digital equivalent…
2. Not possible to zoom in or out of the pictures at this time – too great a risk of people making good resolution prints at that point – and would be a potential legal issue to people buying my limited edition prints… we’ll revisit if iPad comes out w/ Retina display…
3. Made the app free so that people could test it out! Some people don’t seem to like the choice – and would prefer to “pay to play” – not what I was looking for here – was trying to give people a chance to see and perhaps get other photographers to follow along with their own apps. If you like it – then pls go ahead and purchase one collection that interests you or the group for a discount. By doing so you’ll support the app, future photography projects, possibly others apps and perhaps even a video app – your support will make all of that possible! Seemed like the best solution for me to try out the app w/o taking the financial plunge first – and to DECIDE to support the app and future projects IF THEY CHOOSE TO DO SO!
4. Legal mumbo jumbo a sad reality in e-mail – Apple only currently allows text to go ABOVE photos – that’s why photos are buried in there… wish I could have put the photo up top.
5. Orientation issues have appeared since release of OS 4.2 – working on it. Having orientation issues with many of my apps btw – am I alone? New “lock” function doesn’t seem to work… weird. Just go from landscape to portrait and back and it should fix itself… were working on that one bug very hard – only bug that I am aware of myself…
6. I think the app is so much nicer on an iPad screen for size etc – that’s why we discounted the iPhone version… the price should allow us to hopefully break even once Apple etc. get their cut… a lot of overhead.
7. That’s all for now – hope you enjoy the app – and possibly make one of your own!
any interest in a helicopter ride for a few hours in Honalulu January 8th – 16th? Client of mine taking me out (i’m a web guy that loves photography)… fly free?
@jeff mcpherson, Always a very nice offer to fly free! But I’m working that week – cheers -v
no worries! Figured my opportunity to hang with a major inspiration requires either A) major connections or B) a chopper!
Best of luck in 2011 and thanks again for all the info and thought through your work.
@Vincent Laforet,
Hi Vincent, awesome app.
-> don’t agree regarding reporting incorrect new but ‘equivalent’ camera models. truth is the truth. the correct cameras would be interesting + it’s misleading because of the crop-sensor in e.g. the dmk3, that causes the focal lengths not to match up to what it was when you took the photo on film. and the accuracy of this information is the entire point of the technical info display, or am I wrong?
I have a feature suggestion: how about showing micro-previews of the photos in each section, to say help a person, who is interested in portraits.
cheers
georg
@georg, The focal lenghts match exactly. If it was shot with a full frame film camera – I list a 5D MKII as today’s equivalent. 1D series have always been 1.3X, 1Ds series always full frame etc. The micro-previews was a feature we wanted to do – but this is just v 1.0 and we had to focus on the main features first.
@Vincent Laforet,
thanks for your quick reply and clarification!
looking forward to the next version … while enjoying the current albums.
cheers
georg
Love your work, Vincent. Please have a look at our new application for photographers and other artists: http://www.magnet.tv
It’s designed to allow you to sell directly to your fans on Facebook and it also allows them to share your work with their friends.
YO VINCENT!
OK, got your attention, lol. First, iPhone app is awesome, seriously.
Second, sorry to use this blog post for a different reason, but you HAVE to hear this fella’s voice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTysXITBCmk . It’s absolutely amazing, and that’s with a simple mic with a muff, no studio! It’s truly God-given. What tone.
He’s homeless, 2 years clean, and trying to make it. Whoever can give this guy a chance will be in a win-win situation! He’s in Ohio right now.
Thanks! Thought you might find it interesting. I promise not to clutter your blog with OT stuff in the future. =-)
Paul
WOW! Two days on YouTube and that homeless fella with the golden voice has 7,526,968 views (yes, that’s 7.5 million), and more importantly, has already been hired, possibly by the Cleveland Cavs. He was on the news being interviewed, all cleaned up with a haircut. SO, forget what I posted that he needs a chance, a down-and-out person with a talent has been given a great opportunity. Great ending.
wow – now that speaks to the power of the “interweb”
Thanks Vincent, I quite enjoy the app and in particular your videos about the photos.
By the way, unless I am mistaken, some of the the photo captions don’t seem to match what you discussed in the videos.
I don’t have the caption in front of me to be 100% sure but I think one caption said people were fixing the antenna, and I thought you said people went up to fix the lightbulb.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
January 12th, 2011 at 9:55 pm
In the picture they were indeed fixing the antenna – while the assignment was about them fixing the antenna.
Hey Vince –
I think you’re on the right track with this type of direct multimedia publishing model as another way of disseminating content to your audience, directly interacting with them, and creating new opportunities for artists (not just photographers) to help generate revenue on their art.
However, I think the main reason I’ve seen some negative commentary is the way this content is being disseminated: through the App store, as a stand-along application, and an end user has a certain set of expectations for an App. If something like this were distributed through the iTunes or iBookstore, basically as a multimedia eBook or whatnot, that would more closely match the user’s expectations.
In other words, great idea, but perhaps marketed the wrong way.