These are interesting times for filmmakers – the tools keep getting better
Just last week Canon unveiled the Canon C300 and C300PL cameras. A series of cameras with incredible sensors with wide exposure latitude and incredible low light performance that shoot 1080p video up to 30fps on CF Cards.
A little over an hour later – Red announced the Scarlet camera. An equally compact camera capable of 5K but in effect 4K at 25fps in full RAW mode.
After what had already been a huge news day in the film world – Canon snuck one last announcement in: Their Canon Cinema Concept camera – that shoots 4K.
As I saw the announcements coming out – I felt like I was witnessing a fencing bout between two camera giants. Each trying to steal the other’s thunder with subtle parries and strong reposts.
The truth is: all 3 cameras should be of strong interest to all of us.
I do have the benefit of having shot with all of the cameras mentioned in this post- quite extensively. (Notably the C300, and although I haven’t shot with the RED Scarlet (it isn’t available yet,) RED tells me the image performance (depending on compression settings) will be identical to the RED Epic-M that I own and use regularly.)
First an important rule that I firmly believe in: a two newspaper town (or 3) is much better than a one newspaper town. I can speak from experience following my old newspaper days, that a one newspaper town has the paper’s staff become complacent far too quickly.
Without competition, there is no desire to show the other paper up.
I can also say without hesitation that the Canon C300 has one of the top 6 sensors (and supporting processing hardware/chips) in the world. Many people/bloggers out there are erroneously saying the 5DM KII can do as well- but they haven’t a clue, to put it very bluntly.
I’ve tested both – extensively and side by side. The C300 wins hands down- and that’s in relation to almost all cameras out there today (short of the very high end,) not just the Canon 5DMKII. I look forward to putting some tests out there this week.
The Scarlet was a fantastic announcement as well. It is the "Little sister" to the Epic – as Jim Jannard said.
The big surprise: a Super35mm sensor, and the price tag – under $10,000 for the body. Closer to $13,000 – $17,200 depending on how you accessorize it of course. (I’d have to add their gorgeous EVF to the package myself and then add a few 128GB SSD Cards which will add up quickly beyond the $17,000 price mentioned above depending on how many $1,800 128GB SSD Cards you need. Don’t forget that the C300 shoots on compact cards that you already likely own. Both cameras can thankfully shoot on Canon EF lenses – which will significantly help your pocketbook when compared to cinema PL lenses.) This is an incredible camera to own for almost any filmmaker out there – and future-proof. Not only will you be shooting 4K+ resolutions for tomorrow’s screens – but you will also be able to swap out the sensor with more modern sensors down the line – something that is in line with Jannard’s desire to never let your cameras become obsolete. A small detail that you should pay big attention to.
Then came the announcement of the Canon cinema concept camera. All that’s really been said so far is that it will shoot 4K footage and be optimized with a better codec (Motion JPEG) – though likely not a RAW one (but that still remains to be seen or clarified by anyone.)
So where does that leave us? (The filmmakers that is.)
In short: in a very, very good place!
Competition can only benefit us. We will directly benefit from having Jim Jannard and RED going toe to toe with Canon.
And don’t forget Sony, Panasonic, Arri etc. No one can afford to rest on their laurels in this fight.
Trust me.
I will leave you with a few last thoughts:
I had a fantastic set of conversations with a few key executives at Canon as we celebrated the launch of the C300 and the Premiere of Mobius at Paramount studios.
To their credit – they said, and stood firm that a $20,000 MSRP was warranted, given the quality of the sensor and technology of their camera. On that point I entirely agree- and even respect them for not racing to the bottom if you will (of rates/prices/fees) as is unfortunately so often the case today.
That being said, I am also very well aware of the market today, and of the economy. Apple has proven that they can make a significantly greater amount of money by selling cheaper versions of their Aperture and Final Cut X software on their Apple Store – than they did when they sold them at higher prices. (They’re making a significantly greater amount with volume selling the software at a lower price point relative to the higher priced boxed versions to a smaller group of people that they chose in the past (the lower price- not the box vs download is relevant here.)
The truth is, that a Canon 5DMKII, with a lens and a shoulder mount , NDs and monitor will quickly bring any HDSLR filmmaker right up to the $10,000 line in terms of investment. That being said the $700-$2,700 entry point of a bare HDSLR body allows people to start small and dream big… they can build up their system over time… When the C300 starts at $20,000 (MSRP so likely closer to $17,000-$18,000) that barrier is regrettably too high for many.
The RED Scarlet and Canon C300 will quickly rise north of $20,000 when put into almost any production.
I do think, that that $10,000 mark is a very, very big mental limit for most of us in terms for what we buy, versus what we rent. (Big Hollywood productions don’t care about $10,000 versus $20,000 when the alternative is a $60,000 camera, surrounded by $20,000-$150,000 of lenses and accessories.)
I think that while (in the end) the RED Scarlet will likely cost as much, if not slightly more than the Canon C300 when it comes to shooting it on any production big and small – Jim Jannard’s pricing of the base kit gives RED an advantage for what is on paper, clearly a higher performing camera (4K resolution at 25fps and in RAW.) The RED system is also built to be upgradable with new sensors and logic boards over time (not to mention accessories and modules.) The C300, Sony F3, and HDSLRs have not been built to have their sensors etc changed at a later date. Another important consideration.
The Canon C300 has one of the very best sensors in the world – and an image that I love. I can honestly say that I will debate between the Arri Alexa, the Canon C300, and the Red Epic/Scarlet on future productions. Each camera has clear advantages and shortcomings to anyone that has worked with them.
The Arri wins with the best overall dynamic range, notably in terms of highlight retention- but requires a crew, and expensive support, accessories, and additional expensive decks to shoot RAW at a max resolution of 2K. An Arri "package" comes in at just under $100,000. It should also be said that a clear trend is underway towards smaller, lighter cameras. (You can always easily add weight to a camera should you need more stability – not the reverse.) I cannot for example take an Alexa package with me onboard an airplane in my carryon luggage. I can absolutely do so with my Epic/Scarlet/C300 kits with lenses and matte box for example.
The RED Scarlet is cutting edge and offers RAW, HDRx, a tight and light package which is incredibly important. The RED (Scarlet and Epic) is so bleeding edge though – that you will likely spend more on hard drives, and REDRocket cards to work with the incredible data coming off of that 4K-5K sensor. But Stu Maschwitz has a great post on his Prolost blog where he discusses resolution and other factors – including the reality that in effect when you shoot at 4K on the Scarlet you are using a smaller part of the Super35 sensor in effect.
The Canon C300 offers one of the most impressive images out there – notably in low light (likely the best of any camera available today, I’d say better than the Sony F3, and close to 2 stops better than the Alexa) – and is ridiculously small and light – but offers no RAW, no high frame rates, and only shoots 1080p. It does offer a built in EVF, LCD, battery, built in ND filters, and it works with your current CF Cards … that right there is $5K-$10K saved if you price things out – you’ll easily spend that much on the other systems to get those same features. You can also stick a CF card into any machine in the world and look at your footage immediately – with no need for conversion or transcoding.
The Canon concept camera is nothing more than that at this point… there are no details to base any opinion upon at this point. There is no clear winner for "everyone" out there.
That being said – I’d love to see Canon consider leveling the price out of their C300 – because I’d like to see it in as many hands out there as possible. The camera is perfect for features, indies, and documentaries (probably the best large-sensor documentary camera in the world today.) I do have to respect them for not racing to the "bottom" if you will – in terms of setting the price too low.
Nonetheless – the goal should always to bring the price down of a base camera closer to what I consider to be the "magical" $10,000 price level.
As we all know, the camera body is but the starting point of what will ultimately be an ever growing list of accessories, lenses and expenditures. THAT is where the camera manufacturers win on their end – and rightfully so (or none of these options would be around for us choose from…)
Here are two examples that demonstrate the image quality of these cameras – what we all can agree on is that we’re light years ahead in terms of that image quality and dynamic range than we were just a few years ago… (not to mention price!!!)
The Canon C300:
Mobius from Vincent Laforet on Vimeo.
For more details and behind the scenes footage go to:
https://blog.vincentlaforet.com
Note that this version is a 720p version of the film that is optimized for fast playback on the majority of systems. It does not show the optimum image quality in terms of resolution and compression.
For the High Quality 1080p version of this film go HERE.
The Red Epic (shown at 1080p below vs 5K unfortunately which isn’t quite fair to anyone out there… technology (and mostly our monitors) are standing in the way of me showing the footage to you in 5K.)
EPIC #308 from Vincent Laforet on Vimeo.
Interesting times.
The downside on the Scarlet seems like the sensor crop that occurs when shooting with faster fps. Much of the characteristic of the lenses you use will probably be lost in the crop, right?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 1:10 am
The more you crop into a sensor (or the smaller the sensor [same difference]) the more depth of field you will have – and the narrower effective field of view you will end up with – yes.
Im not sure how the 300 is the best Doco tool
If low ISO negates the need for ND that is a major advantage
The FS100 however has IS (does the canon – I guess so) and Auto focus, which does help on occasion
Also when shooting doco there are a slew of conventional 1/2 and 2/3 cameras that are amazing tools with built in ND parfocal lenses and a bunch of other elements that help you capture reality as it happens
Not to mention zoom lenses that have a broad range of coverage
A couple of questions on the canon..
Can you get pixel to pixel on the monitor while recording?
Is there a chance of a lanc type controller to pull remote focus through the camera
Does IS work
Nice thoughts
Thanks
SMM
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 1:20 am
i’d pick the C300 over any other camera (including the Sony F3 and the FS100) any day. Both of those are GREAT cameras. But without S-Log and the accompanying recorder – they immediately pale in comparison to the C300.
I think that 1/2 to 2/3 sensors are coming to an end – Jannard sure seems to think so as well when he ditched the 2/3 sensor w/ the scarlet and opted for the Super35mm Epic sensor. People want less depth of field as evidenced by the proliferation of HDSLRs in the Docu world.(Even though those cameras have relatively inferior ergonomics and no XLR etc.)
The zoom lenses are another issue – that’s separate for sure. I’ll give you that point. But few of them work on the Super 35 sensor – so it becomes somewhat of a moot point.
I’m not sure about pixel to pixel – but you can definitely punch in on the monitor for focus on the C300.
No LAN that I know of – but you can access the camera via WIFI and do a significant amount. I’ve yet to see any video AF that I’d trust anyway – it’s just not there yet IMO – still a few years away (I’ve tried to AF video systems on $500K broadcast cameras…)
I never got to try IS to be honest – but it should. Until I can confirm it – I obviously can’t and shouldn’t.
So far out of Everything I have read about the debate between the 2 new cameras i’ve liked yours the most because you explain both parties equally!!! Thank you!
I would love if the c300 would drop price to atleast $13,000 so it’s more comparable to the F3! Either way Love the review!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 1:24 am
Appreciate it.
At the risk of sounding like i’m blowing my own horn- I’m one of a dozen people to have actually worked with the C300 to date. Most people on the web are going off of spec sheets – and that’s an almost irresponsible thing to do. The C300 is unimpressive on paper I’ll readily admit. I myself wasn’t impressed when I first saw the specs. When I saw the image coming off of the camera and ultimately graded and projected – I became a big fan of the camera.
I agree with your price entirely. But I’m not the one you need to convince…
@Ben Hensley, Oh and I’d like the price to drop so I can afford one as well! lol So I guess that makes me biased. haha
@Vincent Laforet,
Im talking about a lanc controller to pull focus manually without having to use a FF
Also the lanc/external focus device could compensate for the short throw of some canon lenses and lack of hard stops
This could be really good, as FF slow down lens changes, and without that zoom lens you might need to do a lot of lens swapping
(when shooting doco)
As for AF yes it is a bit terrible on all vid cams (I come from stills on a D3 – thats AF that works) but actaully within certain confines it can be pretty cool on the FS100/Kit lens
To be tempted by the 300 I would want ..
.. a nice 18-80 or 100 lens (not a red style monster which is the same size as a 300 2.8) but something akin to the 24-105
.. a controller that takes full advantage of the facilities built into canon electronic lenses
.. a rock solid way of checking focus,
Because lets face it , OOF S35 looks worse than in focus 2/3
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 1:37 am
No I know what you’re referring to (trying to go to sleep!)
Neither the lanc/external focus will ever work well w/ the Canon USM motors in my opinion. I know of several companies that have put months if not years of research and work into it (and succeeded) but one could never get a smooth focus pull with USM motors. They are meant to HIT a target with AF not smoothly (especially not slowly) follow a moving subject.
I think that the truth is that an entirely new set of lenses needs to come out (with built in IS.) While I do see Canon showing a series of new zooms and cine lenses – I don’t see any w/ IS – which as I’m sure you know is a big secret to most camcorders: the built-in IS along w/ the Digital IS makes every docu shot that much more useable..
And yes OOF S35 sucks – but so do 2/3 backgrounds 😉 So moving forward on better S35 lenses is the way to go – not looking backwards at 2/3 sensors.
The Alexa’s ArriRaw is capable of close to 3k. Footage I’ve worked on were 2880 x 1620 (if you consider that 3k).
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 1:39 am
I don’t -not really. Arri will have 4K at some point for sure. Using your analogy the C300 is a 3.6K (or close) camera… They and many others are using higher resolution sensors to produce a pristine lower resolution image – which based on what i’ve seen from both the Alexa and C300 is not a bad idea. That being said the Epic 5K images are pretty pristine as well – but the price is a less performant chip at higher ISOs.
@Vincent Laforet, it is my understanding that the external controllers such as the OKii dont work because the camera does not talk to the lens fast enough
That is a limitation of canon DSLR protocols – which were designed to shoot stills tethered in a studio
The 300 has an option for new faster protocols
As for the inherent suitability of the motors.. Im not a tech head and dont really know
Canon have a mission to wrestle $20k out of me for doco shooting
Im sure the image is wonderful BTW
The Canon C300 seems way better suited to filmmakers vs. the Red Scarlet-X – and I say this as a filmmaker with an Epic-X in transit as I type this.
My prediction is that more stuff at Sundance 2013 will be shot on the Canon then on the Scarlet-X – 4:2:2 to CF Cards in a package that has everything built in, a gorgeous low-light 4K sensor, and the ability to use cheaper Canon glass is basically a dream-come-true for indie filmmakers.
@Vincent Laforet,
Do you think that canon will stick to 8 bit codec on their C300? Due to the way it’s sensor handles color does it even matter anymore? In other words do I get something equivalent to at least a 10 bit codec image in a pratical sense? If so then the C300 is the clear winner for me! The only think that bumps me out is the 8 bit codec that could be a problem for extensive color grading work.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:33 am
I’m amazed with what I saw from an 8-bit 4:2:2 sensor. 8 bit is always 8 bit though to be fair! That being said our image never broke up during grading sessions at Efilm on a 22 foot screen.
This is reminding of the work by a fellow out of South Dakota who specializes long timelapses taken at night during thunderstorms and clear skies.
http://dakotalapse.com/
Great review Vincent. I also agree with you about the “magic” $10,000 (accepting that you add at least half again or more when it’s all pimped out). It’s also what makes Scarlet sooo tempting…it at least _feels_ like I could afford it.
The Canon is way out of my price league though, and I don’t understand why they went this route – a cheaper camera would have sold in volume. Well, I would have bought one!
The other potential deal breaker is the 8 bit image, but this is going off the spec sheet, as you say. I’ll have to rent one sometime to see what it’s like “in the flesh”. Great to have so many options though. Now the wait for the 4K DSLR begins…
Thanks again for your review.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:31 am
The 8bit never was an issue for us…
Vincent,
Have you shot with the 1D X yet? I know it won’t have the dynamic range of the C300 or its other features but for those of us with feet in both stlls + video it may remain an option.
Do you know if it does as well as the C300 at reducing moire and artifacts?
How is the C300 in terms of ruggedness compared to a 1D series or a 5D?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:31 am
No one has yet shot w/ the 1DX on a project that I know of. It will be an interesting side by side in low light. But I don’t expect the 1Dx codec to be anywhere near as clean as the C300’s XF codec.
Great piece Vince.
I am very interested in the Canon Glass vs some of the cine competition. At $47k it should be amazing. I use a RED 18-85 t 2.9 and I wonder if there is a big difference in optical quality between the too.
Do you know if the Epic M will allow us to swap chips in the future? I have one that I absolutely love, but wasn’t sure of the upgrades (not that it needs much).
FYI if you’re in S FL and don’t want to bring yours I’d be happy to let you use mine, as I have learned so much from your site.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:30 am
Thanks Greg. Yes – Red will allow you to swap sensors on both the Epic and Scarlet. I’d have to do a scientific side by side test w/ the RED vs Canon cine lenses to be fair. Given purely the price and my memory of both glass (I’ve used both)- The Canon glass is ahead (and many times more expensive)
Thank you! It’s great to get an honest assessment from someone who has actual hands-on experience with all the competing cameras. I’m leaning towards Scarlet myself but the C300 looks very impressive. Great job on Mobius by the way.
I feel like i’m being forgotten here. The true indie revolution started with the 5d cause it was under $5000. I have seen great things shot with only $5000 worth of gear. $17,000 this is too expensive for most of us (the 99% LOL).
Most of us are drooling but our wallets will bring us back to earth (or our spouses). All these companies making Sliders, matte boxes, follow focuses, etc. benifited from the 7d and the 5d (t2i 60d) not a $20,000 camera. Your site benefits from us too. Take way us and you have way less people on your site at your seminars. So who is this camera for ? We loved reverie cause we thought maybe we could do the same (even if it was not true LOL) I Hope canon makes a under $5000 camera
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:27 am
You’re not being left out Thomas- those cameras still exist… I just want to get the newer, better cameras into your and everyone elses’ hands…
Thanks Vincent. Great comparison…didn’t know RED nickel and dimed you on so much stuff.
Could you blog about their continuous aperture lenses next? Curious what you think of them vs. using regular DSLR lenses w/ stepped apertures.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 8:26 am
I wouldn’t say Red is nickel and dimming anyone – they’re absolutely up front (see their packages on their site.) I think a lot of people on the web though aren’t thinking things through when they look at the base sticker price.
As far as primes – no one has been able to use them yet. We’ve just seen the behind glass at the event ourselves…
Very few “documentaries” were shot on 35mm film, the expense and size of the equipment were the prime considerations at the time.
Now, that is no longer true. The Canon C300 is an absolutely tiny camera compared to a film camera with the same frame, but I find it very amusing to see the Canon mated with a zoom lens that is 4~5x the size and weight of the C300. I could not imagine shooting off my shoulder with that! long throw PL glass is $25k~50k, not much of a bargain for shooting a documentary! The smaller 2/3 cameras & 1/3 cameras do have their place, depending upon the shoot!
I come from a 16/35mm film background, also 2/3″ TUBE & 1″ “portable recorders” video, so the gear I’m seeing now is frankly amazing in all respects.
Vincent L & Philip Bloom were very influential in my purchasing a 7D, I have had a great deal of fun with it and look forward to all the new toys, but for my work the next purchase will be an xf100 or xf300. That’s the right tool for what I do. The 7D is a great “B” camera, though I have been using it as an “A” camera for the past year!
Cheers,
Great site!
Malcolm
Scottsdale, AZ
Vincent, Congrat’s on Mobius. Also great post and breakdown of the cameras. Would love to see the C300 come down in price, for me I’ll have to rent it. Now my question is about the new Canon primes, will they work with the 5DMarkII or 7D?
As a documentary filmmaker, the C300 has some nice perks to it in that it’s light and will fit in with my 5D workflow as a killer A-camera with pro-audio(goodbye Zoom!). However, again as a documentary filmmaker, the 20k price point is really a hard barrier. What would be nice if perhaps Canon helped subsidized the purchase point for existing 5D/7D users…almost like a trade-in without having to trade in the actual cameras. Almost like Reds loyalty upgrade plan…or what it used to be at least.
Either way…very interesting times. Thanks for being on the ground reporting back to us!
Thanks for the real-world insight into the strengths and weaknesses are with these cameras. Only a select have had their hands on these cameras.
I think the C300 is being overlooked by many and think Scarlet X is the solution based on a few factors. The reality is that the workflow is familiar with the C300 and Scarlet X is drastically different on many levels.
Thanks Vincent!
I think RED has a slight advantage because of what you get for the same price as the Canon.
I think Canon missed their market with the C300. Its the sub $10,000 market that made Canon what it was. All the hype and praise was around how affordable it was to make a film now all thanks to Canon DSLR’s. So I think the C300 disappointed most of the Canon market.
While RED was already out of reach, but with Scarlet its a tiny bit closer to reach and is atleast rentable for $250 a day vs the Epics $1400 a day rental fee.
RED has more of a Luxury car model, so they will nickel and dime you but you’re getting…a RED, its like driving to the set with an S class Mercedes.
With Canon they were like Hyundai, great features comparable to Mercedes but without the Mercedes price tag.
Now I feel Canon is like a $120,000 Hyundai. Because of the perception I won’t pay that for a hyundai but I will pay that for an S class Mercedes, atleast my ego gets something out of it.
Well articulated. These are great times to shoot, edit and create. What is happening is the democratization of creativity.
Assuming the 1Dx is a solid step up from the 5D MKII, wouldn’t it be wiser to spend the 7 grand on the still/video camera and buy 13 grand in glass. What would you do.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 11:15 am
Until I use the 1DX I don’t have a good answer for you – fair enough?
Hi Vincent,
great work on the short! Really impress with this camera! Im thinking seriously on buying the C300. I was wondering if there was a crop on the EF lens because it a S35 sensor? And If so, of How much exactly? I ask the question because I read a post saying the sensor was able to keep the same focal lens of the EF lens… Is it true or a false rumor???
Thank for the infos.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:45 pm
1.5X crop factor for super 35.
Thanks for always sharing your wealth of knowledge in this area Vincent. Your work with the C300 was by far my favorite of the four films. Incredible images and I am glad someone who has actually used this camera, with great success, is standing behind the capabilities of what Canon has released.
I don’t understand all of this bashing of Canon just because the camera they released isn’t in the price range of a DSRL. They obviously have been pleased enough with the success of the 5D mark ll and its siblings to make this giant leap into Cinema cameras. I for one don’t mind that they were bold enough to try and compete with the Big Guns of Cinema.
I might have to save up a lot more money to get a C300 but for those of us who are serious about film making, it is perhaps the most affordable option to purchase. Looking forward to your comparisons of the C300 with the DSLRs. Thanks for sharing your point of views without bias and for inspiring so many of us to keep pursuing the dream
@Vincent Laforet, The Canon C300 has a 3.6k sensor. Sure. But it outputs files that are 1920×1080. What I meant was that the Alexa has a 3.5k sensor but is capable of outputting 2880×1620 files, which I’ve worked on before. Not trying to argue about one camera being better than the other. I was just wondering if you knew about the Alexa being capable of outputting 2.8k files.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:45 pm
I am. The truth is that the Alexa RAW workflow – is NOT YET EASY. RAW in general on these cameras is a hog.
Vincent,
Which of the news cameras do you suggest for doc/event/corporate shooters that want to move from DSLRs?
Some think that Scarlet X is the best solution simply based on “specs”. Frankly, RED seems like a miserable workflow for these types of shooters.
Your thoughts?
Thanks, Chris
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:44 pm
Workflow is a serious issue. If you have time and want the best – RED is something to consider. My 20 years of journalism experience suggest doc/event/corp clients want things done YESTERDAY…
Vincent,
Thank you for the time and effort taken.
Thorpe has said about the C300 that in order to bring it to market in such short amount of time, they lifted the electronics and codec from the XF300, and added it to the new developed S35 sensor. And that’s my main problem with it, great sensor, mediocre (8bit) output.
The Sony F3 has 3DLink, LUTs, 60p@1080, simultaneous SDI outs with SLog+LUTs, uncompressed 444 RGB and 10bit. All of this is of relative importance for indies, but it’s very relevant for pro filmakers, Networks and for the TV-commercials guys as me.
The C300 lacks ALL of it.
Also, a 50Mbps 8bit signal will fall apart in grading no matter what people say otherwise. With the F3, you can connect it to HDCAM SR or a Gemini and get clean 10bit 444 up to uncompressed. The F3 is a great low budget substitute to the Alexa, as it costs 1/3 of it, both in acquisition and rental.
With all the lacking features, why do you think Canon assumed they could price the C300 at $20k -the same as the F3 with the SLog option- being it just an FX300 with an S35 sensor?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:41 pm
The F3 isn’t there – sorry. Have worked with both… It’s an EXCELLENT camera – but I’ll take the C300 over it any day. Once you put an external deck on an F3 – you might as well go w/ an Epic (let alone Scarlet!!!!) given the price and weight. Think about it…
@Vincent Laforet, I’ll see you to it in March.
This is the best read I’ve seen on the issue. The fact that you’ve actually used these cameras puts you among the few who can actually give some honest comparisons.
Hey Vince its hard to analyze the camera quality on Mobius because im caught up in the story wondering whats going to happen, good job.!.. I wish the informants clothes were a little more dirty though, you should have grab some damp dirt off the ground & smeared it on him,, maybe a little bit of sweat stains on the cowboy hat also!!…. Other than that im wondering if the Concept 4k camera is going to be the 5d3…
Hey Vincent, so would you say that the C300 has a visibly better image than the Epic? Even though the Epic shoots RAW and can be graded any way you want?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:40 pm
No not at all. The C300 has better low light performance… but the Epic has higher resolution and slightly better dynamic range. If you have all the light you want – the Epic is likely the way to go. If you are shooting with available light – the C300 is an attractive solution.
Great post Vincent and Mobius is seriously EPIC, or should I say C300!? Great story, amazingly shot, well done!
Between the C300 and the Scarlet or really ANY digital camera out there today regardless of resolution, would you say the camera of choice for the best dynamic range would be the Scarlet/Epic because of the HDRx?
With your EPIC, do you typically film without HDRx on or is it practical to think that you can shoot in HDRx all the time? The C300 or the Scarlet is in my future and the HDRx sounds rather appealing but wow the C300 looks amazing!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:39 pm
HDRx is outstanding technology. The only problem w it is that it shoots at a different interval than the first frame – i.e. fast moving subjects won’t work as well as slow pans / tilts etc. I use HDRx a lot of the time on the Epic – but truth be told the RAW image coming off of that camera our indeed EPIC. I love the C300 for its simplicity and low light performance. I love the Epic because I have a thermonuclear reactor of technology in my hands…
What type of system would you suggest for working efficiently with a Scarlet/Epic?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:26 pm
Support? i.e. handheld?
@Vincent Laforet, Computer set up. I am saving my money and look to get a Scarlet but first I want to get the right computer for the job. I want a Mac Book Pro but the new imacs have more power it seems.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 7th, 2011 at 10:42 pm
If you are going RED – make sure you can use a RedRocket card to decode. That means one of the new thunderbolt PCI boxes… or one that goes beneath you MBP.
@Vincent Laforet, So how do you think the Scarlet will compare with the c300 in terms of Image quality and grading etc… I understand that the EPic and Scarlet will be comparable. I currently shoot with a 7D so anything would be better than that . I am about to release my first project (SHot with no budget at all) on Veteran’s Day.
One thing I’m wondering about that no one has seen to mention, (Vincent you may know the answer to this) the footage from the Mobius film was transferred to film, that’s right to film! It was projected as film at the Canon opening through an actual cinema film projector. Although a little deceptive on Canon’s behalf, that’s all well and fine as it was used as a cinema camera, but is the footage we are viewing on VIMEO the film transferred footage or the direct digital file form the edit master.
I personally felt the image quality looked awesome, sure you can always pick it but as an overall filmic look it really had it, much better than a standard RED (can’t comment on EPIC) , better than anything I’ve seen, but was it film or video?
Also the RED is apparently a marketing hype that it’s true 4K, it’s actually 2K, and perhaps if you blow up the Canon image to 4K it outperforms the RED as the RED is interpolated. A lot of tests have to be done. I’m half sold on the Canon, but the price is such a big let down. But was it video or film, that I need to know.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 8th, 2011 at 5:50 pm
The footage was never transferred to film for Mobius. It was for Richard Carrudo’s film however and they showed both at Paramount.
Hi Vincent,
could you please explain what is “Canon’s peripheral illumination correction”. The EF primes cine lens that are coming are full frame… Is that mean there a crop factor on theses lens? That woudnt make sens!!
And again… What happen with the normal EF lens? Is my 24mm-70mm stay that way? Or does it become 36mm-105mm with the new C300 S35 sensor??? Thank you
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 8th, 2011 at 5:48 pm
It just takes into account the normal light falloff on those lenses and corrects for them. Suggest you turn that off for video.
Thanks for your post. I didn’t read through all the comments so I apologize if this a repeated question but you stated that both cameras will be able to have their sensors upgraded in the future. Are you saying that the Epics/Scarletts/C300s as of now can be upgraded?
I have not read this anywhere and for me, certainly plays into where I put my money. Currently, I do not own, I rent, because my productions vary so much, therefore my needs change often. But I’m willing to invest in cameras if I know they will not be obsolete in a year or two. Spending $5k, $10k, even $20k every two years will ruin me (I’m married with children 😛 ) especially sinking my money into something that goes down in value. But then again, it’s my livelihood so I have no problem spending the money as long as it’s shelf life is longer than that of a fruit fly (yes, a little exaggerated, I know)!
Thanks.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 8th, 2011 at 5:47 pm
Just Scarlet/Epic. Not Canon.
@Vincent Laforet, I think he was sending a message to Canon.
@Vincent Laforet, LANC = Sony’s remote control protocol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LANC
What I’d like to see is an HDMI output that can stream to RAID, but without any superimposed graphics (like focus boxes or text). BlackMagic Intensity cards make that interface easy to gulp data into a MacPro..
Hey Vincent,
I’ve sent you an email from christian.balbuena@gmail.com to studio (at) vincentlaforet.com hope you can check it out…
@Vincent Laforet, That makes since. Am I correct in saying that HDRx uses twice as much HDD space as shooting without it?
I haven’t read anything on the C300 about an upgrade option from 4:2:2 to 4:4:4 like Sony did with their F3. Can this camera output 4:4:4 in any way?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 8th, 2011 at 5:46 pm
No mention of that upgrade w/ C300. HDRx does indeed use twice the space.
@Vincent Laforet, Oh sorry, i just finished reading a post above that asnwered my question.
@Vincent Laforet,
Or build a Hackintosh. I edited 4k RED footage real time in PPro CS 5.5 with no rocket card. Easy as pie!
Specs:
980x i7 running at 3.75ghz (6 core)
24 gb RAM – 1600mhz (2ghz with over clock)
NVidia GTX 285
SSD HD
4TB RAID 0 WD Blacks
12x Blu-ray writer
Super Drive
750 watt PSU
Cooler Air Tower (Massive! Holds a lot of HDs)
Mouse
Right at $3k
Oh, and for Davinci Resolve I got 12FPS with ONE GPU! Let me put another Nvidia and an ATI for GUI, and I’ll be real time with RED footage.
Saving $$$ just on the rocket card is worth it, having PC NVIDIA cards to stack with color grading (that would not fit in a Mac Pro) is worth it.
Saving $3k is another plus.
Finally, Apple may discontinue MacPros (rumors of course).
Nice cameras!! I think RED made a smart move. My actual camera is an iPod touch so I’m gonna stick to it, till i get the some money :).
Here is a short film i shot on my iPod touch, i was amazed by the results:
here is the link: http://vimeo.com/31632891
shop you guys can check it!
Hey Vincent!
One other interesting difference in the C300 & Scarlet…
You can buy the Scarlet with a TI EF Mount and also swap it out for their PL TITanium mount so all your lenses can be used. The C300 appears to be either PL body or EF body and no ability to change mounts.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 9th, 2011 at 2:19 am
Yes. I mentioned that in the article – very unfortunate.
Thank you for this great post. As a person getting more and more into directing and shooting short film and music videos on a very very (non existing!) tight budget this holds a lot of valuable information! I feel excited that things are moving forward in the “indie” film making marked. and there is a serious competiton! Im sure every one wants to shoot with the Alexa Studio given the chance! Who wouldent, but as you say the idea of taking a small (1-2 man) crew on location without 10+ flight cases and a crew needing craft services is a brilliant thing! 🙂 Its easy to get caught up in the tech race of these cameras but in the end of the day I think its all about what suits your need for telling a great story and these great cameras do indeeed make it possible to do so in a quality that never before has been avaliable to our comunity and I think that the most important way at looking at it.
I would love to shoot on either of the cameras if I got the chance.
Hi Vincent,
i really like your criticism on stuff you do all the time. a fair play view to the market, and in the world of “fan boys” we need this kind of view.
Just one thing about RED that i think they are “still” better in term of technology is that the camera (Epic or Scarlet) is evolutive and when you can add what the C300 has already (EVF, CF Card, etc.) you can add them to your red camera system, but you can’t add 120 fps, HDRx and RAW to the C300 even you pay more money right now.
The big BAD point on RED is that you still need to be on list and wait for ever (year ?) to get your system to be ready (maybe except when you’re a famous director already and can make somehow the RED system more famous).
While Canon or Sony camera system will be available in your camera shop around the corner.
As we all know how fast Sony, Canon or any other japanese company operate with new technology, as RED i wont be ease with myself.
Cheers.
Boris
You tweeted that this camera would cut well with the Alexa…How do you think this would cut with the 5DmkII?? The chips are incredibly different but would a 5D be a good C-cam for a C300 shoot on A/B??
The low light, form factors, and simple workflow are really becoming appealing to me but need to understand how to make a shoot come together well..
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 9th, 2011 at 11:19 am
It will cut well w/ the 5D – but the 5D will pale in comparison.
Could you please tell me which cheap LED Panel I can in Amazon for regular recording videos with a Canon T2i?
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 9th, 2011 at 8:40 pm
I use the 1×1 Lightpanels listed in the gear section.
Been an amazing week since the announcements. Both cameras have their strengths and respective weaknesses which you have clearly pointed out. I’m a huge fan of Red and even put down a deposit on a Scarlet but I have to say having had a week to digest the insane flow of hype and analysis I think the C300 is a much more viable tool for myself. Just the hidden costs and practicalities of shooting with the Scarlet are too high risk for me right now. Having seen what is possible with the C300 (principally Mobius, it was the stand out short) I see it as the perfect transition from the 5Dmkii. Thanks for your candid take on both systems. Been very helpful and given me some clarity around an important decision.
@Vincent Laforet, whether you go with an F3 or C300, an external deck is necessary for higher quality shoots. So we can shoot 10-bit 4:2:2 SLog with 14 stops of dynamic range from the F3 to a Ki Pro Mini (ProRes HQ), or for the same price go 4:2:2 8-bit from the C300 to the Ki Pro Mini. Seems a no-brainer to go with the F3 for the greater leeway in post. I understand you saying the C300 has a superior look right out of camera, I’m inclined to believe it, but do you really feel it’s better than the possibilities inherent in 10-bit F3 SLog? If so, can you please specify in what way (e.g. color, dynamic range, noise, etc.)? Thanks for your feedback, it’s invaluable for the thousands of us who can’t test an C300 first-hand.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 14th, 2011 at 8:24 am
I have done side by side tests w/ the F3 and C300 WITHOUT decks and I would definitely go w/ the C300. BUT -not w/ the decks.
Vincent, I heard that RED’s sensor is unreliable. Is this true? And which camera is better in terms of grading, C300 or Scarlet?
PS. How do I get on the Vincent Laforet team?!
🙂
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 15th, 2011 at 1:04 pm
RED’s sensor is absolutely reliable.
Personally for 20k or around there I would expect a bit more, I mean at least 4k and variable frame rates, perhaps 120fps at a lower rez. However i digress I could also be spoiled from technology these days. Everybody has to remember that just a couple of years ago cameras for blockbuster films costed 600,000 dollars, now the Arri Alexa is 88k which if put in context would make anybody jump on it. But I feel that now we have become used to the technology and prices and we think 10k for a pro camera is too much LOL. The cameras here are ment for a studio to buy not some plummer who makes webisodes for fun :). Just my 2 cents.
The c300 does sound brilliant in spec but the 5dmkii is still pretty special, Hal Hartley (cult indie director) just made a movie on it called “Meanwhile” see his Kickstarter site, he’s raised 47k toward finishing it. http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/260302407/meanwhile
That Hal Hartley trailer looks great in HD at possiblefilms.com but imagine if it was shot on this c300, anyway anyone making a film in a 5d gets my thumbs up, backed him in kickstarter!
Möbius looks amazing very Michael Mann, love it, that’s the actor from The Cape.
These are exciting times.
@Erich Ocean, aren’t Scarlet-X supports the same cheap canon glass? It’s more like the red gear is primary money consuming thing with this baby.
Good to hear from someone who has actually used the c300.
Funny how it took years to get cameras ergonomically right, then Sony cracked it with the Beta SP and canon for the lenses, and for decades everything trundled along. Now with single chip cameras it seems like we are going back to the start (all be it with better image quality.)
I love to shoot with single chip cameras, but they have a long way to go ergonomically before they can be used to shoot documentaries in the same way 2/3″ cameras can. That said I will probably get a Canon c300 as the look is worth the extra effort.
@Vincent Laforet,
I’ve shot 4 features and a ton of other footage using a Red One with a Birger Canon mount that has wired and wireless follow focus of EF lenses.
We’ve pulled thousands of slow, smooth focuses.
Canon lenses can definitely be used to pull smooth focus in narrative work. Some lenses are better than others, but all the L lenses seem to be terrific.
I think Canon missed a giant opportunity by not including that support.
RED will get their follow focus for Canon lenses working and we’ll see a ton more production done that way.
Birger is releasing a Canon mount for the F3 and then the FS-100. Try one out!
I know there are USB controllers for Canon DSLRs but I have never tried on of those and can’t comment. Perhaps they are giving a bad name to the idea. Birger has it pretty well figured out at this point.
Always enjoy your articles. This Canon seems almost ideal excepting the price. Here’s one more vote for $13K street.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 22nd, 2011 at 9:54 pm
Appreciate it. The USB controllers simply cannot achieve smooth focus. While you “can” pull focus w/ EF lenses for sure (it depends a lot on WHAT lenses you’re talking about btw – good luck pulling focus on a wide zoom…) I prefer the comfort of marks and a cine lens any day. That’s because I don’t want to have to stress out w/ the idea of “is it in focus?” – i’d rather focus on the content – as I’m sure you would to.
Hey Vincent great job on Mobius..
I’v been looking into the scarlet and the c300 at first i was thinking red but as i looked more into it and it seem like in practicality the price is more that the said 15,000..i read that those 64 gb red mags record a very short amount of footage at high resolutions and since any resolution below 3k does not seem very unusable lens wise that mean your gonna pay $950.00 and up for more storage ..plus batteries(which is expensive as well) , plus the very heavy post production workflow that red footage requires..seem like a hassle for someone like me who just wants to do commercials and short films…how ever the raw in red gives more latitude which I think is essential especially when I am gonna do live action (compositing) or any type of vfx work or mixed media work and grading , Now I’m sure the 8bit 422 mpeg2 2 codec is usable in most cases for the c300 and honestly I don need 4k that…..but why has canon limited the hd-sdi to 8bit as well at the very least give me the option to record a higher bit rate externally with a codex or an Atomos Samurai witch I think would solve the whole codec problem for many who are accustom to pro res and what not and since I keep hearing how similar the the c300 camera ability to hold highlights is similar to that of Arri’s Alexia would externally being able to recorded the same format as Arri not bring it even closer..a ten-bit recording system like Sony’s HDCAM SR, Apple’s ProRes and Panasonic’s AVC-Intra are pretty much the norm now; the additional bit depth will significantly improve not only color sampling accuracy, but color correction and grading later in post production..which is all I really wanted red raw for..can canon alter that 8 bit limitation via firmware and if not do they plan to have any serious consideration for external recording.(via codex possibly)..for $20.000..its the least they can do
Interesting times ahead for all us filmmakers. I agree the competition between the companies – specially with Red now entering the market in a big way with two camera price ranges – makes for exciting innovations.
Having been a cinematographer for 20 years, I can’t remember a time when there has been such a fast pace of change in the equipment available to shoot on.
I am on board with the Red train at the moment but keep a close eye on what the others are doing so thanks for taking the time to share your experiences.
Thanks again !!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
November 29th, 2011 at 10:23 pm
Appreciate it – and yes – we all need to keep an eye on what is going on everywhere…
hi vincent,
mobuis is great …one very important questions , some say that there is a little rolling shutter with c 300. the recent popular test of c 300 (which is also featured on pro lost , stu’s blog) shows the rolling shutter comparison with 5d and c 300. but it compares the footage which is moving up and down and not indulging in horizontal movements , in which it becomes very easy to gauge the rolling shutter problem.. even in that test (rolling shutter part )there is something rotten for sure …
please shed some light . thanks for all that you have shared
only the best of the wishes
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 2nd, 2011 at 8:10 pm
Rolling shutter exists with ALL CMOS sensors – the Epic, Alexa and C300. We didn’t have a single shot where it was an issue for us and we put the camera through its paces… we have to live w/ it for now in digital and the C300 is one of the best cameras w/ a CMOS sensor that I’ve worked w/ in this area
Thanks for all the great articles you post –
question I can’t find the answer too…does the Canon C300 have frame guides available on the monitor/viewfinder and outputs? (such as for 2.35:1)?
Thanks!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 2nd, 2011 at 8:09 pm
Yes it does – cheers – v
Thanks for the response Vincent! Good to know.
Your blog and career have been a really great resource for people in my career stage to draw upon.
If I have a more in depth question to ask your opinion of, and you have the time, is it better that I post it here or email you?
If you have the time, your thoughts would be much appreciated.
All the best
Brian Lehrer
WinterWolf Media
brianlehrer@winterwolfmedia.com
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2011 at 2:20 am
If you think it would be beneficial to others – please post! If not e-mail production (at) vincentlaforet.com
@Vincent Laforet, its pretty long and while it would be beneficial to others in my position, it’s also very tailored to my situation. I should probably e-mail ya, and I’ll be very grateful if you get around to reading it. If not, I completely understand!
P.S. it’s amazing and commendable that you’re up at 2:20am answering your followers questions! Merci beaucoup!
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 3rd, 2011 at 9:22 am
😉
hi vincent
thanks for the reply really appreciate it :-)..i am very keen on c 300. EF . have few questions.please bear with the list
1. Is there a 12 min clip syndrome or is it like ,where it shoots nonstop for the entire length of the CF card .
2. Does the EF mount take the PL mount lenses ? cause 5d and 7d do take when modified ? if yes, is there a difference in focal length or any other trade off .
3. mostly i will be shooting on location in small interiors / alleys in mumbai in natural light ..(for my low budget indie ) so i was thinking about 16- 35 and 24 – 105 . what would you advice?
4. saw XXIT …..greenscreen work is awesome(thanks to 422) but when it comes to adding cg elements unlike the plane or what ever that was in XXIT ..that plane was poping out wasn’t merging well .. donno weather that was due to lax in visual effects . or …or on set visual effects super vision . or was it because of the camera
Because DSLR skips line’s and forms image in a very idiosyncratic way and cg elements /props cant replicate that weird pattern of the 5d sensor so resultantly you dont get a clean composite , these are all small issues to some vfx people… but this does affect the photo realism that filmmakers are eternally chasing .
in deep gratitude and utmost respect 🙂
only the best of wishes.
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 5th, 2011 at 12:52 pm
1. non stop – and you can hot swap cards to shoot forever theoretically (there are two card bays)
2. no you have to get either EF or PL model
3. those work – I would always go for cine glass myself to pull critical focus… otherwise I would look at the 24~70 2.8 if you are working in low light
4 . there is absolutely no line skipping / aliasing w/ this camera. All other questions should be directed at Stargate Studios
PS; So does the c300 capture image in any way like the DSLR or is there any other trade off ….. and what is debayering of algorithms and what difference does it make to the final image …
Vincent Laforet Reply:
December 5th, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Yes – and better. Expect what you saw w/ the 5D with significantly less compression artifcats, no moire, no aliasing – and a much greater dynamic range.
New models keep on coming. That actually makes it hard for a small video production.